Schedule Delay Analysis — Choosing a Method and Why They Differ
There have always been debates and arguments over which delay analysis method is "the best method" to be used. Hundreds of articles have been published going back to the late 1960's. Which method is best is still a wide-open issue among schedulers, claim consultants, construction managers, contractors and attorneys.
The level of debate has increased in recent years since AACE International published their Recommended Practice — Forensic Schedule Analysis. What has not been widely discussed or written about is what factors should go into the decision-making process when choosing a delay analysis method for a particular project or a specific claim.
Listen to this 90-minute recorded webinar to get answers to such pressing questions as:
- Learn to choose a delay analysis method
- Understand what factors and issues should be addressed before committing to a potentially lengthy and expensive process
- Discover if the choice of delay analysis method irrevocable once made
- Determine the risk of trying to change methods in mid-stream
Our expert instructor, Jim Zack, provides answers and insights to these issues and highlight the 11 factors the scheduler should at least consider when making a choice.
Presented by James G. Zack, Executive Director, Navigant Construction ForumTM
Generally good explanations of the various salient points that must be considered, prior to moving to the proper schedule delay methodology. Drew Ray
Hill International | Fast pace seminar - good information. Anonymous Participant | I felt good about the overall delivery of the webinar and expertise of the speaker. John Clark
MWH Global |
