Court Addresses Hybrid Sales and Construction Contract

A contract to furnish and install equipment was a “hybrid” contract involving both the sale of goods and the performance of construction services. The service component was predominant, with the sale of goods incidental to the service. Consequently, the contract was governed by the common law of contracts, not the Uniform Commercial Code.

The Construction Claims Advisor summary of this case is available to ConstructionPro Networkmembers and includes:
    •    The citation for the case (case name, case number, and date filed)
    •    An overview of the case
    •    Background information about the case
    •    A summary of the ruling
    •    A summary of the court’s conclusion and the resulting outcome
    •    Editor's commentary
    •    A link to the complete PDF copy of the original opinion