Editor’s Notes

It is self-evident that a contractor and a subcontractor to whom the contractor has assigned a portion of the work should be working from the same defined scope of work. What happens when a contractor negotiates a change order with the project owner, increasing the scope and the price of the work, and fails to disclose the change order to the subcontractor performing that work? A Tennessee court sorted out this situation as it addressed claims for fraud and breach of contract.

Once again a question has arisen regarding design professional responsibility during the construction process. The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled that neither the contract documents nor the engineer’s conduct created a duty to warn a laborer of unsafe conditions at the job site.

The third case in this issue involves a contract admonition to expect “periodic delays” due to traffic at the job site. The term “periodic” did not mean infrequent and was not a representation of the overall volume of traffic. And, the project owner did not withhold superior knowledge, as bidders had ample opportunity to observe traffic conditions when pricing the work.




WPL Publishing - 5750 Bou Avenue #1712 - Rockville, MD 20852

Phone: (301)765-9525  -  Fax: (301)983-4367

All Content and Design Copyright © 2024 WPL Publishing
About Us

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

My Account