ConstructionPro Week, Volume: 5 - Issue: 35 - 09/09/2016

Bad Schedule Article Follow Up: Is Schedule Manipulation a Problem?

By Paul Levin, PSP


In last week's issue I penned an article about schedules, trying to make the point that there are schedules that may not conform to best practices but still serve the purpose of helping a contractor to effectively plan and manage a project. While some people might call non-conforming schedules "bad," I would prefer to consider them as useful but still have room for improvement. 


My friend John Livengood of Navigant Consulting posted a comment disagreeing, saying that there can be bad schedules, particularly ones that may hide crucial information from the very persons that develop them.  Worse yet, according to John, there are too many schedules produced these days that are manipulated.  This seems to be the same view of Stuart Ockman in an August 15 interview with Richard Korman at ENR.comThe interview in fact is titled "Not Enough Is Being Done to Stop Critical-Path Schedule Manipulation."  In it, Ockman cites software as partly at fault by providing features that are easy to misuse, and lack of education. Those charged with development of construction schedules need to learn more than just the software, and they need to learn the importance of intellectual honesty. 




WPL Publishing - 5750 Bou Avenue #1712 - Rockville, MD 20852

Phone: (301)765-9525  -  Fax: (301)983-4367

All Content and Design Copyright © 2023 WPL Publishing
About Us

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

My Account