PROCUREMENT VIOLATION DOES NOT YIELD COMPENSATION FOR IRKED BIDDER

Supreme Court of the State of Alaska

By Pam Hunter

Lakloey, Inc. v. University of Alaska

No. S-11624
March 31, 2006

A general contractor argued that it was entitled to damages because the owner changed the bid date and bid criteria after the contractor submitted its bid. Specifically, the owner’s addendum adjusted the amount of required builder’s ... Log in to view the full text.