NO FINAL BILL OR DEFINITIVE CONTRACT PRICE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN LIEN

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Steadfast Construction, Inc. v. Apter et al.

No. 61039-2-I (unpublished)
September 2, 2008

Overview

A Washington court has ruled that a mechanic’s lien should not have been reduced as “clearly excessive” merely because the cost-plus contractor did not submit a final bill. The contractor adequately documented the costs included in its lien.

Whispering Brook Development ... Log in to view the full text.