Article Date: 08/22/11

GROUNDWATER FLOW WAS NOT DIFFERING SITE CONDITION

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Frontier Pipeline, LLC v. Metropolitan Council

No. A10-1437 (unpublished)
July 25, 2011

Overview

A Minnesota court has denied a contractor's differing site condition claim arising out of groundwater flow rates during excavation. The contract documents made no affirmative representations regarding flow rates. And, reliance on soil test borings for conditions at greater depths was not reasonable.

Background

The Metropolitan Council ... Log in to view the full text.

NOT YET A SUBSCRIBER?

Purchase a Subscription
with a money-back guarantee
and immediate access

OR

Buy This Item Individually
Price: $0.00

Already a member?

Email: REQUIRED

Password: REQUIRED

Forgot your password? Click here to have your password emailed to you.