Article Date: 09/17/2007

CORRESPONDENCE DID NOT SATISFY CLAIM NOTICE REQUIREMENT

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department

Fahs Rolston Paving Corp. v. County of Chemung

No. 501219
September 6, 2007

Overview

A New York court has ruled that a contractor’s correspondence regarding alleged extra work and contested remedial work did not provide timely notice of claim, as required under the terms of the contract.

Background

Chemung County awarded ... Log in to view the full text.

NOT YET A SUBSCRIBER?

Purchase a Subscription
with a money-back guarantee
and immediate access

Already a member?

Email: REQUIRED

Password: REQUIRED

Forgot your password? Click here to have your password emailed to you.