Article Date: 06/28/2013


Low Bidder Did Not Violate Anti-Bid Shopping Law


A low bidder’s failure to name a plumbing subcontractor did not violate the state anti-bid shopping statute. The plumbing work was incidental to other work and was to be performed by a lower-tier subcontractor that was not required to be named in the bid.

 

The Construction Claims Advisor summary of this case is available to ConstructionPro Network members and includes:

  • The citation for the case (case name, case number, and date filed)
  • An overview of the case
  • Background information about the case
  • A summary of the ruling
  • A summary of the court’s conclusion and the resulting outcome
  • Editor's commentary
  • A link to the complete PDF copy of the original opinion

 



NOT YET A MEMBER?

Purchase a Membership
with a money-back guarantee
and immediate access

OR

Buy This Item Individually
Price: $20.00


Already a member?

Email:  

Password:  











WPL
PUBLISHING CO, INC.
WPL Publishing - 5750 Bou Avenue #1712 - Rockville, MD 20852

Phone: (301)765-9525  -  Fax: (301)983-4367

All Content and Design Copyright © 2017 WPL Publishing
About Us

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

My Account