Article Date: 09/10/2012


No-Damage-for-Delay Clause Enforced - Exceptions Didn't Apply


Overview

 

An Illinois court has ruled that a no-damage-for-delay clause barred a subcontractor’s recovery. The delay was not unforeseeable or of an unreasonable duration. And, Illinois law does not recognize “active interference” as an exception to enforceability.

 



NOT YET A MEMBER?

Purchase a Membership
with a money-back guarantee
and immediate access

OR

Buy This Item Individually
Price: $20.00


Already a member?

Email:  

Password:  











WPL
PUBLISHING CO, INC.
WPL Publishing - 5750 Bou Avenue #1712 - Rockville, MD 20852

Phone: (301)765-9525  -  Fax: (301)983-4367

All Content and Design Copyright © 2017 WPL Publishing
About Us

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

My Account