Article Date: 09/10/2012

No-Damage-for-Delay Clause Enforced - Exceptions Didn't Apply

Overview

An Illinois court has ruled that a no-damage-for-delay clause barred a subcontractor’s recovery. The delay was not unforeseeable or of an unreasonable duration. And, Illinois law does not recognize “active interference” as an exception to enforceability.

NOT YET A SUBSCRIBER?

Purchase a Subscription
with a money-back guarantee
and immediate access

OR

Buy This Item Individually
Price: $20.00

Already a member?

Email: REQUIRED

Password: REQUIRED

Forgot your password? Click here to have your password emailed to you.