Article Date: 09/25/2015


State Specs Defined Work But Not Payment


A federal contract incorporated standard state specifications to define the work, but excluded any payment provisions in the specifications from the contract. Payment was determined solely by the unit-price bid schedule. A contractor’s interpretation to the contrary would create a patent ambiguity and the contractor failed to seek pre-bid clarification.

 

The Construction Claims Advisor summary of this case is available to ConstructionPro Network members and includes:

  •  The citation for the case (case name, case number, and date filed)
  •  An overview of the case
  •  Background information about the case
  •  A summary of the ruling
  •  A summary of the court’s conclusion and the resulting outcome
  •  Editor's commentary
  •  A link to the complete PDF copy of the original opinion

 



NOT YET A MEMBER?

Purchase a Membership
with a money-back guarantee
and immediate access

OR

Buy This Item Individually
Price: $20.00


Already a member?

Email:  

Password:  











WPL
PUBLISHING CO, INC.
WPL Publishing - 5750 Bou Avenue #1712 - Rockville, MD 20852

Phone: (301)765-9525  -  Fax: (301)983-4367

All Content and Design Copyright © 2017 WPL Publishing
About Us

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

My Account