Inconsistent Use of Federal Site Conditions Clause Alleged

An out-of-state highway contractor lacked standing to sue state highway officials for alleged inconsistent application of the federally mandated Differing Site Conditions clause. The contractor claimed that in-state contractors received better results when filing site condition claims against the state. 

The Construction Claims Advisor summary of this case is available to ConstructionPro Network members and includes:

•  The citation for the case (case name, case number, and date filed)
•  An overview of the case
•  Background information about the case
•  A summary of the ruling
•  A summary of the court’s conclusion and the resulting outcome
•  Editor's commentary
•  A link to the complete PDF copy of the original opinion