Article Date: 09/11/2015


Inconsistent Use of Federal Site Conditions Clause Alleged


An out-of-state highway contractor lacked standing to sue state highway officials for alleged inconsistent application of the federally mandated Differing Site Conditions clause. The contractor claimed that in-state contractors received better results when filing site condition claims against the state. 

 

The Construction Claims Advisor summary of this case is available to ConstructionPro Network members and includes:

  •  The citation for the case (case name, case number, and date filed)
  •  An overview of the case
  •  Background information about the case
  •  A summary of the ruling
  •  A summary of the court’s conclusion and the resulting outcome
  •  Editor's commentary
  •  A link to the complete PDF copy of the original opinion

 



NOT YET A MEMBER?

Purchase a Membership
with a money-back guarantee
and immediate access

OR

Buy This Item Individually
Price: $20.00


Already a member?

Email:  

Password:  











WPL
PUBLISHING CO, INC.
WPL Publishing - 5750 Bou Avenue #1712 - Rockville, MD 20852

Phone: (301)765-9525  -  Fax: (301)983-4367

All Content and Design Copyright © 2017 WPL Publishing
About Us

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

My Account