ConstructionPro Week, Volume: 6 - Issue: 19 - 05/12/2017

What Good Are Government Manuals?

By Bruce Jervis


Government agencies at all levels are fond of publishing guides and manuals pertaining to construction materials and methods. They are usually detailed and precise. And, they are available, primarily online, to anyone with an interest.


One might think these agencies should be lauded for their transparency regarding their construction needs. There is a problem, however. The manuals state they are provided for purposes of information and guidance only. Only a contract defines the required scope of work.


 The U.S. Court of Federal Claims recently grappled with the status of a “materials manual.” The manual, not incorporated by reference into the contract, specified testing procedures at odds with what agency officials actually used on the job. The manual was admissible evidence regarding the agency’s understanding of trade custom and practice. But trade practice cannot supersede the express terms of a contract. And, broad language in the contract gave the agency discretion in its choice of testing methods.


So, what good are these “informational” manuals and guides? They can’t be relied upon unless expressly incorporated by reference into the contract. They are frequently a source of confusion and misunderstanding. At worse, they can create contractual ambiguity. Why publish them at all? Your comments are welcomed. 



The simplest solution to resolve this ambiguity is to religiously incorporate by reference all relevant manuals and guides into the contract.
Posted by: Rohinton Kadva - Saturday, May 13, 2017 12:33 AM


WPL Publishing - 5750 Bou Avenue #1712 - Rockville, MD 20852

Phone: (301)765-9525  -  Fax: (301)983-4367

All Content and Design Copyright © 2022 WPL Publishing
About Us

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

My Account