SHARE:

 

 

ConstructionPro Week, Volume: 5 - Issue: 10 - 03/11/2016

Have You Seen All the Contract Documents?

By Bruce Jervis

 

Many project owners, contractors and subcontractors use their own “standard” forms of agreement. Not surprisingly, these customized contracts tend to favor the drafting party. What is disturbing is the lack of transparency. Sometimes, the other party never actually sees the document. The drafting party seeks to impose its terms through reference.

 

In a recent Alabama case, a contractor issued a purchase order to a subcontractor. The order said, “A Subcontract will be created by [contractor] for billing purposes.” The sub never saw or signed the contractor’s “standard subcontract agreement,” yet the contractor argued that by performing work and receiving payment, the sub was bound by the terms of that document.

 

This problem is more widespread than one might think. Cross-referencing among documents and reference to external documents are common in construction contracting. There may be an express incorporation by reference, or it may be just a casual mention. Does your organization have practices in place to determine which documents define the agreement? Are all these documents examined before finalizing the agreement? Your comments are welcomed.

 

COMMENTS

The "problem" clearly demonstrates the benefits of standard contract documents. The Engineers Contract Documents Committee (EJCDC) and the American Institute of Architects (AIA) have standards that are clear, concise and time tested. As for transparency, both have clear rules for depicting any changes to the standards for a project
Posted by: Jim Brown - Sunday, March 13, 2016 12:14 PM










WPL
PUBLISHING CO, INC.
WPL Publishing - 5750 Bou Avenue #1712 - Rockville, MD 20852

Phone: (301)765-9525  -  Fax: (301)983-4367

All Content and Design Copyright © 2017 WPL Publishing
About Us

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

My Account