As an English major and LEED Green Associate, I have heard from engineers, scientists, GCs, proposal departments, project managers, and others -- simple, clear language is something that is sorely needed. Past, present, and future. (I have not dealt with contracts, legal issues, or court decisions.) I hearken back to the KISS principle -- keep it simple, stupid. I would tend to agree with Ohio -- the "plain language movement" is/should be ongoing and continuous.
Posted by: Lisa Speak - Friday, January 11, 2013 11:14 AM
In writing my specifications or plan notes I keep short and to the point and I never use the words such as could, may or options etc. I make it clear to the point, however you better be sure what you are writing is accurate.
Posted by: Gary Munguia - Friday, January 11, 2013 12:57 PM
Must we assume the reader does not have an education or a lawyer on retainer? Come on man!
Posted by: Denis Herrmann - Friday, January 11, 2013 1:00 PM
It clearly takes contract language that all parties understand to achieve a true meeting of the minds.
What is the citation for the Ohio plain language pay-if-paid clause to which you referred?
Posted by: Bill Stack - Friday, January 11, 2013 1:01 PM
I am a LEED Green Associate and a published author and at time I have difficulty understanding the language in GC contracts. Colorado also has a "pay if paid" clause, but this is frequently obscure in some of the contract language that I have seen. We have an attorney review all of our contracts for this reason. In my view, the plain language movement is a good thing and should be continted and even expanded. There is no reason that a contract cannot be written in easy to grasp language without using Latin or any of the "legalese" that now exists.
Posted by: Fred Wellers - Friday, January 11, 2013 1:31 PM
I am a general contractor for residential construction. I started writing my own contracts 8 years ago in simple language. It has made my success at getting homes to build just because the owners can understand what the contract is stating. I did this without any help from a lawyer. I build on cost plus construction and all my clients must write out the checks to the sub-contractors. This allows the owners to have a lot of control over what is acceptable for a finished product. This also makes the subs to a far better job because they know that the check is not ready until the job is done. This keeps the punch list down to nothing and the job is finished sooner than later. We only build houses that are being financed by a bank to protect not me but the subs with lien rights here in Texas. Simplify your life and your contracts.
Posted by: Scott Lusk - Saturday, January 12, 2013 9:51 AM
I just couldn't leave your site prior to suggesting that I extremely enjoyed the standard
information a person supply on your guests? Is going to be back
continuously to check up on new posts
Posted by: Li - Tuesday, January 14, 2014 7:20 PM
Hi there, I enjoy reading through your article. I wanted to write a little comment to support you.
Posted by: Bachus - Monday, February 24, 2014 8:25 AM
Nor does Wall Street's pillaging of private 401 k retirement plans
justify tit-for-tat, eye-for-an-eye acts of covetous revenge against union pensions avicii concert tickets 2014 loan start-up prosper
raises $20 million, led by sequoia.
Posted by: Mansfield - Sunday, April 27, 2014 11:04 PM